https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details Some of the products that may interact with this drug include: barbiturates (such as phenobarbital, butalbital), benzodiazepines (such as clonazepam, lorazepam), sodium oxybate (GHB), valproic acid.
The results revealed that IVM increased the frequency of epithelial tumor in D. melanogaster considering all evaluated concentrations, while AMX showed no carcinogenic effect. 0053名無しのアビガン(北海道)(アウアウウー Saa5-ND5a)2022/01/03(月) 00:37:02.30ID:vwb8ssrTa チャイニーズハムスター細胞でDNA破壊を確認w やべえええ猛毒やんこれwww やっぱ古い薬はチェックが甘いからやべえの多いわなあww 最新技術で調べたらすぐに危険性が調べられるのになw
Our current observation allows us to communicate for the first time the in vitro evaluation of DNA damage produced by these antiparasiticides: a brief 80 min pulse-treatment of 5.0–50.0 μg/ml of IVM or 25.0 and 50.0 μg/ml of ivomec®, resulted in a manifest level of single DNA-strand break induction. This findings are in concordance with previous observations showing a genotoxic effect exerted by the abamectin, the most active form of the avermectin (avermectin B1a), able to induce single strand DNA breaks in rat hepatocytes from rats treated in vivo [27].
IVM reduced testicular volume, tubular diameter and germinal epithelium height. Spermatogenesis interruption, such as degeneration morphology of the germ cells
Spandidos’ story is one of a cheater who was caught with fake data and sacked by the University of Toronto, worse even, that fraud allegedly cost the famed cancer research Robert “Bob” Weinberg the much desired Nobel Prize. There were even two books on the Spandidos affair, one written by the NYT journalist Natalie Angier to restore Weinberg’s reputation, and one by Weinberg himself. But here is the 1996 summary in Boston Globe:
もちろんニセ科学のゴミ論文を量産する悪質な奴らであることが知られているwww
The moral of this whole Spandidos and Weinberg story is that cancer research is so full of fraud that it barely changes anything when Spandidos’ publishing enterprise churns out utterly fabricated paper mill products. It’s like an extra pile of dung dumped on a giant steaming heap of manure.
Cancer research, dear reader, is run already for decades by an international mafia of criminally skilled scientific dimwits. And now over to Smut Clyde, helped by Tiger BB8, and the new cancer research paper mills they uncovered.
The editor-in-chief of Oncology Reports, virologist Demetrios Spandidos, told Nature that he has been contacted by Byrne but has not yet had enough time to evaluate all data described in the manuscript. The editor-in-chief of Gene, molecular biologist Andre Van Wijnen, did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Our current observation allows us to communicate for the first time the in vitro evaluation of DNA damage produced by these antiparasiticides: a brief 80 min pulse-treatment of 5.0–50.0 μg/ml of IVM or 25.0 and 50.0 μg/ml of ivomec®, resulted in a manifest level of single DNA-strand break induction. This findings are in concordance with previous observations showing a genotoxic effect exerted by the abamectin, the most active form of the avermectin (avermectin B1a), able to induce single strand DNA breaks in rat hepatocytes from rats treated in vivo [27].
IVM reduced testicular volume, tubular diameter and germinal epithelium height. Spermatogenesis interruption, such as degeneration morphology of the germ cells
Our current observation allows us to communicate for the first time the in vitro evaluation of DNA damage produced by these antiparasiticides: a brief 80 min pulse-treatment of 5.0–50.0 μg/ml of IVM or 25.0 and 50.0 μg/ml of ivomec®, resulted in a manifest level of single DNA-strand break induction. This findings are in concordance with previous observations showing a genotoxic effect exerted by the abamectin, the most active form of the avermectin (avermectin B1a), able to induce single strand DNA breaks in rat hepatocytes from rats treated in vivo [27].
IVM reduced testicular volume, tubular diameter and germinal epithelium height. Spermatogenesis interruption, such as degeneration morphology of the germ cells
The results revealed that IVM increased the frequency of epithelial tumor in D. melanogaster considering all evaluated concentrations, while AMX showed no carcinogenic effect. 0091名無しのアビガン(東京都)(ワッチョイW 2e58-ND5a)2022/01/07(金) 12:26:22.00ID:kp+RWFHf0>>79 まとめ バカメクチンが「抗がん効果アリ!」の根拠としているこの「論文」 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/ ↑この中で紹介されてる「乳がん細胞を殺した」とされている「論文」↓ https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mmr.2017.8231#f2-mmr-17-02-3397 ↑これを読むと「がん細胞にイベルメクチン作用させたらがん細胞が死んだよ(でも健康な細胞を殺さないことを確かめてないからどんな細胞でも無差別に殺すよ)」という サリンでも青酸カリでも「抗がん剤」扱いされてしまうという およそ科学の基準を満たさないトンデモなゴミ「論文」であることが判明
Spandidos’ story is one of a cheater who was caught with fake data and sacked by the University of Toronto, worse even, that fraud allegedly cost the famed cancer research Robert “Bob” Weinberg the much desired Nobel Prize. There were even two books on the Spandidos affair, one written by the NYT journalist Natalie Angier to restore Weinberg’s reputation, and one by Weinberg himself. But here is the 1996 summary in Boston Globe:
もちろんニセ科学のゴミ論文を量産する悪質な奴らであることが知られているwww
The moral of this whole Spandidos and Weinberg story is that cancer research is so full of fraud that it barely changes anything when Spandidos’ publishing enterprise churns out utterly fabricated paper mill products. It’s like an extra pile of dung dumped on a giant steaming heap of manure.
Cancer research, dear reader, is run already for decades by an international mafia of criminally skilled scientific dimwits. And now over to Smut Clyde, helped by Tiger BB8, and the new cancer research paper mills they uncovered.
The editor-in-chief of Oncology Reports, virologist Demetrios Spandidos, told Nature that he has been contacted by Byrne but has not yet had enough time to evaluate all data described in the manuscript. The editor-in-chief of Gene, molecular biologist Andre Van Wijnen, did not respond to Nature’s request for comment.
Spandidos’ story is one of a cheater who was caught with fake data and sacked by the University of Toronto, worse even, that fraud allegedly cost the famed cancer research Robert “Bob” Weinberg the much desired Nobel Prize. There were even two books on the Spandidos affair, one written by the NYT journalist Natalie Angier to restore Weinberg’s reputation, and one by Weinberg himself. But here is the 1996 summary in Boston Globe:
もちろんニセ科学のゴミ論文を量産する悪質な奴らであることが知られているwww
The moral of this whole Spandidos and Weinberg story is that cancer research is so full of fraud that it barely changes anything when Spandidos’ publishing enterprise churns out utterly fabricated paper mill products. It’s like an extra pile of dung dumped on a giant steaming heap of manure.
Cancer research, dear reader, is run already for decades by an international mafia of criminally skilled scientific dimwits. And now over to Smut Clyde, helped by Tiger BB8, and the new cancer research paper mills they uncovered.